Over the years I've grown to have quite the collection of RF cables in my lab, some with better datasheets than others. But how good were they really? I decided to fire up the VNA and collect some data to see how a few of them really performed.
- Data was collected on a Pico Technology PicoVNA 106 with current traceable calibration, at a controlled 21C ambient temperature with 45% RH.
- SOLT user calibration was performed immediately before data collection.
- All SMA connections were torqued to 5 lbf-in.
- SMA female-female couplers were used between the VNA cables and the DUT cables. These were not de-embedded as I don't have a VNA cal kit with SMA male terminations.
4001 S-parameter points were collected at even intervals from 10 MHz to 6 GHz. I used Sonnet's S-parameter viewer for analysis of the collected data,
Cables tested (all SMA male-male)
- CD International
- Crystek Microwave
Insertion lossResults were mostly as expected - longer cables had higher loss, and higher quality cables had lower. I was a little disappointed to find that the Crystek semi-rigid cable didn't outperform the Mini-Circuits, though.
|S21 of cables under test|
After normalizing to cable length, results were:
- Mini-Circuits .086: 0.71 dB/foot
- Crystek Microwave .086: 0.76 dB/foot
- CD International RG-188: 0.78 dB/foot
- CD International RG-174: 1 dB/foot
Return LossBetter quality cable assemblies definitely won here.
|S11 of cables under test|
The CD International RG188 cable got as high as -17 dB S11 at 4.77 GHz. The worst Crystek cable hit -25.1 dB at 2.63 GHz, and the worst Mini-Circuits cable hit -25.4 dB at 1.51 GHz.
Propagation VelocityNothing too surprising here.
|Group delay of cables under test|
- Crystek .086: 1.68 ns/foot (0.61 C)
- Mini-Circuits .086: 1.53 ns/foot (0.66 C)
- CD International RG-188: 1.49 ns/foot (0.68 C)
- CD International RG-174: 1.60 ns/foot (0.64 C)
Phase MatchingFor the cables I tested two of, I zoomed in to compare how tightly the propagation delays were matched.
Most of these measurements are a bit noisy because I'm pushing limits of phase resolution on my VNA.
|CD International, 3 foot RG-174. Looks like one is about 50ps shorter?|
|CD International, 3-foot RG188. Can't see any skew at all.|
|Crystek Microwave 1-foot .086. Maybe 50ps of skew?|
|Mini-Circuits 2-foot flex .086. No observable skew.|
ConclusionsThere's a few takeaways from this little experiment.
First, at the speeds I currently work at, there appears to be no need to worry about buying expensive phase-matched cables. While different types of coax had significant skew between equal-length cable assemblies, skew between two units of the same SKU ranged from "at the edge of my ability to measure" to entirely undetectable.
Given that my oscilloscopes sample at 20 Gsps when not doing channel interleaving, the maximum skew between any of the identical cables tested would result in a single sample of phase error. This shouldn't be enough to cause problems with my measurements.
Second, all of my cables have non-negligible loss. Even the high-quality Mini-Circuits cables have 0.8 dB of loss at the 2 GHz bandwidth limit of my current flagship scope, and 1.1 dB at the 4 GHz bandwidth limit of the new one I have on the way. I'm definitely going to start thinking more seriously about de-embedding cables from my measurements moving forward.